Information Brief 2013-48
ACT National Curriculum Survey®: K–12 and College Science Educators’ Ratings of Science Content Topics, Science Process Skills, and Engineering Practices and Topics
Average Importance Ratings for Science Content Topics, Science Process Skills, and Engineering Practices and Topics
Note: Importance ratings in the survey were labeled as follows: 0 = Not Important, 1 = Low Importance, . . . 4 = High Importance.
Because the framework for the recently released Next Generation Science Standards includes engineering as a primary component of K–12 science curricula, we asked participants in the 2012 ACT National Curriculum Survey to rate the importance of a group of engineering practices and topics.1 This group included both content and processes specific to engineering. We also asked participants to rate the importance of general science content topics (the established body of knowledge about physical and natural phenomena) and of general science process skills (e.g., making observations and measurements, designing and refining experiments, considering variables, making predictions, and drawing inferences and conclusions).
Survey participants rated engineering practices and topics as much less important than science content topics or science process skills. These results suggest that, in contrast to its prominent inclusion in the Next Generation Science Standards, engineering is not an important part of the current science curriculum.
1 ACT, Inc., ACT National Curriculum Survey 2012: Science (Iowa City, IA: Author, 2013). http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/NCS-Science.pdf.
firstname.lastname@example.org for more information or to suggest ideas for future ACT Information Briefs.